trustfelling: (Default)
Trustfell Mods ([personal profile] trustfelling) wrote in [community profile] trustfelled2016-07-10 01:20 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

Week 2.

WEEK 2

With the deaths of Sayaka Maizono and Mallick Scott the first week draws to a close. While you all have varying opinions on what happened and who was to blame, one thing's for sure: the Adjudicator isn't messing around.

Saturday is given to regrouping and sleep; on Sunday morning the clock chimes as it always has, but at least there are no bodies to find today. It seems you're safe for now. The night before wasn't necessarily a peaceful one, however; you'll probably feel a bit groggy when you wake up, and it seems you've regained something that you didn't realize you'd lost...

However, those weird dreams aren't the only new thing around here; those massive double doors on the southern wall of the foyer have opened up, leading down another hallway and ending in what looks like another corridor to the west. Go ahead and explore as much as you like; consider it your reward for a job well done.

Or perhaps for just playing the game.

COMPETITORS REMAINING: 28


SUNDAY | MONDAY | TUESDAY | WEDNESDAY | THURSDAY

[OOC: Welcome to week two of Trustfell! Don't forget to save your threads for coins and the activity check, and don't forget to submit this week's activity check and memory regains!

If you'd like to get in contact with the Adjudicator, you can do so here!]
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
notaccurate: (82)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2016-07-11 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah...true, that trial was quite disturbing.

[He's not going to acknowledge the dream, because he doesn't want to talk about his dream right now.]
greenmamabear: (You are experiencing a day)

[personal profile] greenmamabear 2016-07-11 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. It was.... yeah. I don't even know what to say about that
notaccurate: (02)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2016-07-12 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
It's probably best not to dwell on it. Now that the consequences have been made very clear, I doubt anyone will make that kind of mistake again.
greenmamabear: (Getting my nerves up)

[personal profile] greenmamabear 2016-07-12 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
[She's not convinced.]

Fingers and toes crossed.
notaccurate: (69)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2016-07-12 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
If you're worried, you could always buddy up too.
notaccurate: (84)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2016-07-12 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
It is very hard to get twenty-eight people to stick together all the time. But if we stay in small groups of three or four, then it would be much safer.
greenmamabear: (Color me surprised)

[personal profile] greenmamabear 2016-07-13 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
...I guess that would make sense. The trouble is getting people to agree to it.
notaccurate: (36)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2016-07-13 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
It would be worth having a meeting over. But, ah... I don't think I would be the best person to call that meeting.
greenmamabear: (You're not sure what this is)

[personal profile] greenmamabear 2016-07-17 07:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Why's that? You're good with words and shit.

[Kind of. I mean, he's quick to grasp stuff a least.]
notaccurate: (89)

[personal profile] notaccurate 2016-07-19 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
I'm...not exactly a commanding presence.

[That's putting it delicately.]

One-on-one it's not a problem, but I, ah... I don't do well in groups, especially not if the attention is on me.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only